Google Verification Yahoo Verification Google Verification Tulsa Criminal Defense: July 2008 Google Verification

Well, What are You Going to Do for Me? Work, Work, Work!!!

What are You Going to Do For Me? Work, Work, Work!!!
by Glen R. Graham, Oklahoma Criminal Defense Attorney, Email:

Most client's charged with a serious crime want to know what the lawyer is going to do for them. The answer usually boils down to the philosophy of work, work, work. The first step is conducting your own independent investigation of the facts. Maybe, visiting the actual scene of the crime. Consider taking photographs of the scene and looking for evidence. Maybe even take the client back to the scene an re-live the incident --- maybe do some psycho-drama. It can provide real power in testifying when the client re-lives the incident and discusses all the emotions. It can increase the authenticity of the client when testifying in court. I will talk to the witnesses. Especially, I will talk to the client to gather up all the facts in the matter. That's why is can be very frustrating when the client wants to know what you are going to do for me? Well, most importantly, the client must come to the office and discuss the case. You might be surprised how many client's seem to not have the time to come to my office to discuss their case. How can I adequately prepare for the case when the client won't even come to my office? Are they afraid of me? Are they avoiding me because they don't have that payment for me that they promised me some time back? Sometimes, it makes me wonder? It is absolutely necessary to conduct an in depth interview of the client to find out all facts, issues, and all evidence and witnesses in the case.

One thing I will do, I will try to out-work the prosecutor. The prosecutor has multiple cases that he is handling all at the same time. The prosecutor is a professional juggler, handling many cases, hoping none of them fall. My practice is limited to just a few cases by comparison and I can spend more time on the case which should produce a better out-come.

I am going to devise a defense strategy and work on the theme of the case. I am going to research the law and study the statutes and cases dealing with all the issues in the case. I am going to study the facts and the law. One trick I have learned over the years, (21 years) is to look at the jury instructions to see what defenses might be available and to look at the jury instructions regarding the legal issues that will be presented to the jury. However, the jury is also the judge of the facts and therefore I must gather up all relevant facts which will assist me in advocating my client's side of the case to the jury.

I am going to file motions in the case. I am going to file a request and motion for discovery and obtain copies of all the law enforcement reports in this case and any exculpatory evidence. I am going to look for issues around the arrest and the search and seizure. I will file motions to suppress or motions to quash the arrest and/or motions to quash the information and/or motions to dismiss and/or other motions which will assist us in pursuing a defense in the matter.

I am going to prepare for a trial in the case.

I am going to advise my client how to behave, how to dress for court, and what to expect.

I am going to be over-prepared for court. I am going to out-work the prosecutor.

I am going to work, work, work.

Yours in the Defense of Fellow Human Beings,

Glen R. Graham, Attorney for the Accused, Tulsa, Oklahoma

Protecting the Rights to a Fair Trial Against Unfair Media Stories

Protecting the Rights to A Fair Trial Against Unfair Media Stories in Oklahoma by Glen R. Graham, Attorney at Law 918.583-4621

It is important for any trial attorney to be aware of the Code of Professional Journalism at Society of Professional Journalist web site.

One of the options that a good criminal attorney has is to seek a protective order from the court by filing a motion for a protective order. While there are many limitations on "gag" orders and the media may attempt to challenge the constitutionality of the same, it may be possible to seek an order from the court directing the prosecutor and his staff and the law enforcement personnel be prohibited from releasing certain kinds of questionable facts such as:

Illegal Confessions; Statements of the Accused; Questionable Out of Court Identifications; Illegal Evidence or Evidence Illegally Acquired; and the release of any facts which may cause undue prejudice to a fair trial such as the prior criminal record of the accused.

From Wikipedia: “Guaranteeing the presumption of innocence extends beyond the judicial system. For instance, in many countries journalistic codes of ethics state that journalists should refrain from referring to suspects as though their guilt is certain. For example, they use "suspect" when referring to the suspect, and use "allegedly" when referring to the criminal activity that the suspect is accused of.”

“More subtly, publishing of the prosecution's case without proper defense argumentation may in practice constitute presumption of guilt. Publishing a roster of arrested suspects may constitute undeserved punishment as well, since in practice it damages the reputation of innocent suspects.”

Most journalists in the U.S. abide by the Code of Ethics of the Society for Professional Journalists. The code has been revised many times, but today’s code basically instructs journalists to (1) seek truth and report it, (2) minimize harm, (3) act independently and (4) be accountable. The Society of Professional Journalist does not have an enforcement mechanism to enforce its code. It has debated this matter but due to the special nature of the first amendment and the availability of other mechanisms for holding journalist accountable, there is no enforcement mechanism. The code currently is a basic guideline for journalists who are members of the society which is voluntary. Integrity and credibility are considered crucial to many journalists .

Preamble to the Code of Ethics of Professional Journalists
By the Society of Professional Journalists

Preamble to the Code of Ethics of Society for Professional Journalists:

“Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility. Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society's principles and standards of practice.”

Additionally, the Code says journalists should:

Give voice to the voiceless; official and unofficial sources of information can be equally valid.
— Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting. Analysis and commentary should be labeled and not misrepresent fact or context.

Minimize Harm - Ethical journalists treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human beings deserving of respect. Journalists should:
— Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news coverage. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and inexperienced sources or subjects.

— Be sensitive when seeking or using interviews or photographs of those affected by tragedy or grief.
— Recognize that gathering and reporting information may cause harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance.
— Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone’s privacy.
— Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
— Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects or victims of sex crimes.

Be judicious about naming criminal suspects before the formal filing of charges.

Balance a criminal suspect’s fair trial rights with the public’s right to be informed.

Act Independently
-Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the public's right to know.

— Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable.— Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and resist their pressure to influence news coverage.

Be Accountable> - Journalists are accountable to their readers, listeners, viewers and each other.
— Clarify and explain news coverage and invite dialogue with the public over journalistic conduct.

— Encourage the public to voice grievances against the news media.
— Admit mistakes and correct them promptly.
— Expose unethical practices of journalists and the news media.
— Abide by the same high standards to which they hold others.

Struggling with a dilemma on deadline, or just want to talk about a tough call you've had to make concerning an ethical question about journalism? Call the Society of Professional Journalist at 317/927.8000 x208 Simply make the call, leave a message. The SPJ has many journalists and journalism educators on its ethics committee willing to assist anyone who makes a call to its hotline; that includes non-journalists who have questions about the ethics of journalism but there is no code enforcement mechanism regarding journalists.

The Society of Professional Journalist web site at Society of Professional Journalist web site also has a message board where messages are posted and issues discussed by members at message board of SPJ .

Yours in the Defense of Fellow Human Beings,

Glen R. Graham, Tulsa Criminal Attorney, 918.583.4621