Google Verification Yahoo Verification Google Verification Tulsa Criminal Defense: November 2007 Google Verification

A General Description of the Normal Procedure on a Tulsa Felony Criminal Case

A General Description of the Typical Tulsa Felony Criminal Case

By: Glen R. Graham, Attorney at Law, (918) 583-4621, more information at his web site:

The Initial Appearance: Room 173 at 9:30 a.m. - Preliminary Arraignment (scheduling for preliminary hearing) – purpose is to schedule a preliminary hearing but usually it gets passed to give the defendant time to fully retain the lawyer.

The word "arraignment" means to "schedule." So, a preliminary arraignment is a scheduling date for the preliminary hearing. Initially, it is passed for the defendant to employ or pay the attorney.

2nd Appearance: Attorney Retained: Room 173 at 9:30 a.m. - Preliminary Hearing Arraignment scheduling

3rd Appearance: Preliminary Hearing – Room 347 or 344 at 9:00 a.m. on the 3rd Floor. The witnesses to the case are subpoenaed by the State to appear and testify in the event that the defendant wants to challenge the evidence.


A. Drug Court or DUI Court: This should be done several days before the preliminary hearing, otherwise the court may require a waiver of the preliminary hearing before scheduling it.
Drug Court or DUI Court is a court supervised treatment program for people with serious addictions to drugs or alcohol or both. It is an “intensive” supervision program normally something that is chosen as an alternative to prison by someone with a prior record, currently on probation, or as an alternative to prison. Starts with daily requirements like AA/NA meetings and weekly appearances in front of a judge, five phase program, lasts 1-2 yrs

B. Option - Challenge the Evidence & Have an Actual Probable Cause Hearing: You can have or put on the preliminary hearing where witnesses are called to testify. The issue is whether there is “probable cause” to believe that a crime was committed and that the defendant committed the crime. If no, case is dismissed. If yes, then the court gives you another court date to return before the assigned Judge above the 3rd floor in about one week. At that time you can try to work out a “different plea bargain” or you can order a transcript (written record of what happen which is prepared by the court reporter) of the preliminary hearing and file motions based upon the transcript and the new judge will determine those motions.

The preliminary hearing is normally the main chance to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, the constitutionality of the arrest, search, and seizure. If you waive you hearing, then you are normally waiving your right to challenge the case and the evidence.

If you put on the preliminary hearing then the prosecutor will normally withdraw their recommendation.

After the preliminary hearing then the plea bargain may get better or it may get worse, so the final decision on whether to accept the plea bargain or reject the plea bargain is always up to the defendant.

C. Can waive the preliminary hearing because you have a “plea bargain” of some type worked out on the case.

D. Plea Bargain - Option 1 - Presentence Investigation (PSI) – Case may be passed (you waive preliminary hearing) for you to complete a presentence investigation. This leaves it up to the judge to decide whether to give you probation or not and whether to give you a deferred or suspended sentence and what the probationary terms will be. This involves an “investigation” by a probation officer who will perform a urine test on you for drugs/alcohol and a background investigation: criminal record check, social history, soc.sec.number check on employment history, letters to victim, copies of the official police version of the event, your version, a LSI evaluation psychological - social assessment with recommendations, copies of treatment information, and the probation officers recommendation. The Judge will sentence you in part based upon this report, but the Judge always has the final authority to decide what the final sentence will be in your case. If you qualify, the court may allow you to have probation, may allow you to have a “deferred” sentence – probation without a conviction or a “suspended” sentence – probation with a conviction or no probation or a split sentence.

E. Plea Bargain – Option 2 – Suspended sentence - you may be able to plead out without a presentence investigation to a straight suspended sentence. This is a felony conviction with probation but without a presentence investigation.

F. Plea Bargain – Option 3 – Deferred sentence – you may be able to plea out without a presentence investigation to a “deferred” sentence that is probation without a felony conviction. You will still have an “arrest” record but no conviction. If you successfully complete the terms of probation and return on the scheduled review date then the case is dismissed and the conviction is expunged, but you still have an “arrest” record.

G. Plea Bargain – Option 4 – if the prosecutor agrees – amended to misdemeanor – you may be able to plead out to a misdemeanor but only if the prosecutor agrees. This is normally only done in rare cases when there is some “weakness” in the case and the defendant does not have a prior criminal record.

H. Plea Bargain – Option 5 – if the prosecutor agrees – pass the case to obtain additional information or witness information or discovery or other information or to pay off restitution.

I. Option 6 – if bad charges or bad prior record – straight in-time prison recommendation.

If you waive preliminary hearing or if you have a preliminary hearing and are given a new court date one week later, then it will be set in front of another judge.

The next date is called “District Court Arraignment.” At that time you can order a copy of the transcript of the preliminary hearing and file written motion to dismiss, suppress, or other motions. You can also attempt to work out a different plea bargain.

You can set the case for jury trial.

Or, you can pass the case for no issue disposition for about thirty (30) days.

If you waived preliminary hearing based upon an PSI recommendation:
You will appear in front of another judge one week later, then the court will pass the case for thirty (30) days for a no issue disposition date. When you return to court then the court will expect you to enter a plea and begin the presentence investigation. You will enter a plea of guilty in front of the judge and the PSI probation officer will urine test you for drugs that day and begin the presentence investigation. Then court will pass the case for another thirty (30) days for you to complete the presentence investigation. When you return to court it will be for sentencing based upon the presentence investigation. The judge always has the final authority to determine your sentence.

If you are unable to work out an acceptable plea bargain, you might be able to obtain a recommendation from the judge and enter a “blind” plea without a recommendation from the prosecutor and have the judge sentence you.

If you are innocent, you do have the option of a jury trial. A non-jury trial or trial by the judge is only possible if the prosecutor will waive their right to a jury trial and have a trial by the judge.

In rare cases, it might be possible to have a non-jury trial or trial by the judge based upon the transcript of the preliminary hearing, and then appeal the court decision or rulings on the motion to suppress evidence. There is no right to appeal the judge’s rulings on the motions to suppress evidence or any other motions unless this is agreed to or unless there is an actual jury trial. A plea or accepting a plea bargain waives any appeals on the motions.

Similiarities Between the War on Crime and the War on Terror

In his blog, here, Professor Jonathan Simon, discusses the similarities between the War on Crime and the War on Terror and mentions his book: Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear (Oxford 2007). Professor Simons says some people tell him it was true in the 80's and 90's but not now. In response he says:

"That would be true if it wasn't so very clear that for most American political leaders the war on terror has largely been a direct extension of the political categories and rationalities produced by the war on crime whether evil doing criminals, innocent victims, uncompromisable executive leadership, and emotional law making."

I agree with some of his ideas. I think the "war on terror" has been used as a political tool by politicians to scare the public and say vote for me --- "I can protect you."

However, the discussion about what the political candidates are saying to their base is not something most people take literally. Obviously, both Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani are contradicting previous positions to attempt to appeal to the conservatives in their base.

During the general election, the winner inevitably moderates their views to appeal to the majority of voters.

The main point, however, is that "crime" and the "war on terror" are both used as "tools" by the dominant politicians to attempt to win an election.

As the song by the Who goes, ("Won't Get Fooled Again, 1971):

"I'll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I'll get on my knees and pray

We don't get fooled again
Don't get fooled again
No, no!


Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss"

New Laws Legalizing Simple Possession of Marijuana Passed in Denver, CO, and Others

This month, (November 2007) Denver, Colorado, and Hailey, Idaho, joined a growing number of cities in passing an ordinance legalizing the simple possession of a small amount of marijuana.

San Francisco, Oakland and Santa Monica in California, along with Missoula, Montana, and Seattle, Washington, have previously passed laws legalizing simple possession for personal use of a small amount of marijuana.

However, federal laws which supersede city ordinances continue to prescribe heavy penalties for possession of marijuana although most judges will take into account the penalties under local laws.

Professor Berman notes that Time magazine has published a story about this populist movement in his blog: